What Difference Does Marriage Make?

BY Cristen Conger / POSTED January 11, 2011
Hammerbrook - City can this really be true?
submit to reddit
SHARE WITH YOUR FRIENDS
wedding ring on finger

Many, many episodes ago on Stuff Mom Never Told You, I jokingly commented to Molly that we should abolish marriage. We had been discussing the differences between civil unions and marriages, and after dissecting the legalese ad nauseum, I mentioned that maybe we should just do away with the whole thing. Let folks couple up as they will, and call it a day. It wasn’t a serious proposal on my part. Like a good relationship scholar, I’ve read Stephanie Coontz”s Marriage: A History and clearly understand the whys and wherefores of this most-exalted social institution. And marriage brings along myriad benefits, such as improved health, relational stability, income boosts and sheer happiness, right? On average, yes. At the same time, we’re living in a divorce-heavy, cohabitation-happy society. So what gives?

While researching our most recent podcast on whether the seven-year itch exists, Molly and I ran across a number of 2007 articles reporting on a study finding that marital satisfaction actually drops off around the three-year mark. (Hell’s bells, that’s a fast decline!) However, when I tracked down the actual study — “Re-Examining the Case for Marriage: Variation and Change in Well-Being and Relationships” by Kelly Musick and Larry Bumpass — the research wasn’t looking for when the honeymoon phase ends. Musick and Bumpass set out on their meta-analysis because “Literature on the benefits of marriage and cohabitation has largely ignored how wellbeing changes as marriages and cohabitations progress over time, despite clear evidence of relationship instability.” And in fact, that ‘three-year itch’ was a mere side note in its rich findings.

The study instead re-examined a vast body of research on marriage and cohabitation in order suss out “how marriage compares to other intimate relationships or whether the benefits of marriage persist over time.” Do unmarried, cohabitating couples derive just as many mental, physical and social benefits from their relationships? To sum up the 60-page study: yes. When you break down individual benefits of coupling up, it doesn’t make that much of a difference whether you do it through cohabitation or marriage, as the study explains:

The only statistically significant difference between marriage and cohabitation is in happiness, and here, those that enter directly into marriage report smaller gains in happiness than those who cohabit. None of the union transitions has a significant effect on health relative to remaining single, but entering into marriage (both direct marriage and marriage preceded by cohabitation) increases perceptions of health relative to entering into cohabitation. Only cohabitation has a statistically significant effect on self-esteem relative to remaining single, at increasing levels. Cohabitation also increases self-esteem compared to marriage (again, both direct marriage and marriage preceded by cohabitation). In sum, while marriage appears to confer advantages in health relative to cohabitation, the opposite is true of self-esteem, and entering into any union appears to improve happiness and depressive symptoms.

When we look at how long-term “unions” affect happiness, Musick and Bumpass unearthed another interesting tidbit that confounds a lot of what we hear about how finding your one-and-only is the key to personal fulfillment. “Compared to singles, a higher proportion of men and women entering into unions report gains in happiness: 41% of those marrying directly, 49% marrying following cohabitation, and 47% cohabiting only, compared to 37% remaining single.” So while a lot of people experience a happiness boost from entering into long-term relationships, it isn’t a panacea. In other words, marriage (and cohabitation) doesn’t necessarily guarantee all of those benefits attributed to it. According to Musick and Bumpass’ data, the only difference marriage makes is that it might predict physical health. In other words, marriage doesn’t degrade your quality of life, but it might not transform it into a sparkling wonderland, compared to other forms of intimate couplings.

Granted, this is just one study, and statistics can’t confer the individual value of lasting relationships. If you’d like to dig into this debate further, Stephanie Coontz and other experts have hashed it out in the context of second marriages over at the New York Times.

Follow Cristen & Molly from Stuff Mom Never Told You on Twitter and Facebook.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

you might also like

Comments
Advertisement